Supreme Court says no lies to achieve safety Free Movement blog, 25 July 2012
In the case of RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38 the Supreme Court has today held that asylum seekers cannot be expected to lie or dissemble in order to achieve safety in their own country. This principle applies equally to a committed political activist and to a person with no politician convictions: neither can be expected to lie. Continue reading “Important legal judgments – Zimbabwe/behaviour on return and Afghanistan/children”