Lord Ramsbotham, former chief inspector of prisons, attacks ‘perverse’ decision not to prosecute G4S over Mubenga death

A terrible day for the UK Border Agency, as Peers describe its culture of disbelief, its abuse of torture victims, the denial of legal representation, dawn raids on pregnant mothers, the perils of outsourcing, ā€˜loutish and aggressiveā€™ behaviour, deaths by G4S, and thatā€™s not all . . .

Controversial doctor and Barnardoā€™s serve UKā€™s flawed child detention policy

Cracks show in ā€˜compassionate approachā€™ to locking up children for the sake of administrative convenience.

A doctor whose assessment of a vulnerable patient was deemed ā€œirrationalā€ and ā€œtaintedā€ by the then Mr Justice Leveson in a 2006 High Court Judgement has been appointed to an ā€œindependentā€ Panel guarding the welfare of children detained by the UK Border Agency. Dr John W Keen joined the Panel even though he had for years been paid to advise the Border Agency on whether people were medically fit to be deported. Continue reading “Controversial doctor and Barnardoā€™s serve UKā€™s flawed child detention policy”

Immigration Detention Reaches All Time High

(All figures/text from UKBA Immigration Statistics Q1/2012) Ā Thanks to National Coalition Against Deportations Committee:Ā 
There were 3,034 people, 91% of capacity, in immigration detention on 31 March 2012, the highest recorded since publication of data began in 2001, and 14% more than on 31 March 2011.
[Lindholme IRC is no longer has reverted to a HMP Cat D & C) Continue reading “Immigration Detention Reaches All Time High”

Indefinite detention – what you can do

The QARN statement on indefinite immigration detention (see here)Ā has now been adapted by Quakers in Britain and may be used in correspondence with press and local MPs.

The UK Governmentā€™s Coalition Agreement committed the UK to end the detention of children for immigration purposes. Yarlswood Family Unit has been replaced by Cedars, opened in August 2011, with capacity to detain up to 9 families with activities provided by Barnardoā€™s.Ā  Detention should be limited to 72 hours, with ministerial authorisation, this may take place for up to 1 week.Ā Ā  Immigration detention, however, remains for many adults. Where you have first-hand experience of detention, this is an issue that could be helpfully raised with your constituency MP.

See also theĀ Migration Observatory

http://www.quaker.org.uk/news/quaker-statement-immigration-detention

16 May 2012

Quaker statement on immigration detention

Quaker statement on immigration detention

by Quaker Asylum and Refugee Network (QARN)

That which is morally wrong cannot be politically right.

1822Ā Quaker faith & practiceĀ 23.26

We urgently call for the ending of indefinite detention, which is fundamentally unjust and causes much suffering to its victims.

As Quakers we believe that there is that of God in everyone. We see the Testimony to Equality as clearly relevant to our concerns about those migrants and asylum seekers who are kept in detention. They are treated much worse than those born British.

The right to liberty is a fundamental right enjoyed by all people in the United Kingdom, whether British citizens or subject to immigration control. It is a right established in common law as well as protected by the European Convention on Human Rights. Recent anti-terror legislation that allows for terror suspects to be locked up without being charged has been controversial. There has justifiably been an outcry about it and the time limit has now been reduced to 14 days. However, thousands of people are kept every year in detention by the UK Borders Agency with no date set for their release, yet there is no public outrage about this.

The Immigration Act 1971 first included the power to detain immigrants; later legislation has extended or amended that power. People can be detained on arrival in the UK as immigrants or when seeking asylum, if considered likely to abscond, or when they have already been refused the right to remain and deportation is expected to be imminent.

The decision to detain is made by immigration officers without reference to a court. In theory each detainee has the right to apply for bail after 7 days, but many people are unaware of this procedure and find it difficult to access legal advice. The immigration court ā€˜judgesā€™ do not have to be trained or experienced to the level of senior judiciary, inadequate records are kept, and in many cases the Home Office view that the applicant is likely to abscond is accepted without evidence.

In theory it is Government policy not to detain survivors of torture or those with serious medical conditions or mental health problems, but in practice even proven survivors of rape and torture, pregnant women, and those with severe mental and physical health problems are often found in detention. Many innocent men, women and children who have been locked up in immigration detention centres have suffered severe mental health problems, with detention in many cases adding to trauma already suffered in their home country.

16 May 2012

‘How Long is Indefinite?’ documentary

‘How Long is Indefinite?’ documentary:Ā Held without trial for over 6 years and now released with 22-hour curfew as judge says Abu Qatada can no longer be held indefinitely, so why can thousands of immigrants without terrorism allegations be held in this way? What do you think?Ā http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/07/abu-qatada-attorney-general-law

Medical Justice speak out on the treatment suffered by migrants at the hands of UK Border Agency
http://www.medicaljustice.org.uk/news/articles/1923-bbc-radio-4-today-programme-qprivate-border-staff-out-of-controlq-interview-with-emma-ginn-260112.html

BID: unlawful detention cases

A number of cases of former BID clients, which had been referred for unlawful detention claims in the Administrative Court reached judgment.Ā  In all three cases summarised here, their detention was ruled unlawful.

In October 2011, the High Court found that the detention of Mounir Raki, a client of BIDā€™s, for over four years was ‘self-evidently unreasonable’. BID referred Mounir to Leigh Day & Co Solicitors, who represented him in this case. The Judge found that there was medical evidence that Mounirā€™s mental health was deteriorating because of his detention and he was seriously self-harming. The case was covered in theĀ Guardian. Continue reading “BID: unlawful detention cases”

QARN: Statement on Indefinite Detention of migrants and people seeking asylum

On Human Rights day 10 December 2011:Ā http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Day2011/Pages/HRD2011.aspx

As Quakers we believe that there is that of God in everyone. We see the Testimony to Equality as clearly relevant to our concerns about those migrants and asylum seekers who are kept in detention. They are treated much worse than those born British. Continue reading “QARN: Statement on Indefinite Detention of migrants and people seeking asylum”

Sample letter: Transparency of UK BA decision-making regarding detention

DearĀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  MP,

Transparency of UK BA decision-making regarding detention

I am writing, as your constituent, to deplore UK BAā€™s use of detention in the immigration system of this country. It is, in my view an infringement of the individualā€™s rights as a human, and ultimately a threat to all our liberties. It is wrong to lock people up with neither a suspicion nor a conviction of a crime, without time limit. Continue reading “Sample letter: Transparency of UK BA decision-making regarding detention”